There's been some discussion on the local numbers on
Toledo Talk but I was curious as to how other large public school districts were doing in Ohio. For a moment I almost felt sorry for Dr. Sanders who left Toledo to become the Superintendent of the Cleveland Public School system. Cleveland Public Schools did not meet any of the 25 indicators yet somehow ended up in "Academic Watch" because of their performance score of 71.2. I guess the bright spot for Dr. Sanders is he has ample room to demonstrate improvement even if only on indicator ends up being met.
Columbus did better than Cleveland with 5 out of 25 indicators met and a performance score of 79.2. Cincinnati tied with Toledo in scoring 6 out of 25 indicators, however Cinci had a performance score of 81.5, just above Toledo's 80.4. It's often been said that from a size comparison that Dayton (16348 daily enrollment) or Akron (26827 daily enrollment) are similar to Toledo (29157 daily enrollment). Akron scored 7 out of 25 and a performance score of 85.8; Dayton fared worse than Toledo with only one out of 25 indicators met and a performance score of 73.2.
You'd think that with such low numbers the Cleveland Plain Dealer would be focusing on that but, I was surprised to see what started out as a more
upbeat almost fluffy piece that didn't mention the Cleveland Public School systems ratings until page 3 then only briefly in passing.
Dayton Daily News also presented the information on their area schools in a rather upbeat fashion, pointing out at least they were ranked better than Cleveland. The Akron Beacon Journal
called it as they saw it, pointing out that
Forty-three local districts missed this federal threshold, up six from last year.In Cinci? The
Enquirer focused first on the positive and even has a quote from Ken Blackwell's wife on Cincini's performance:
"We are very pleased with our progress," Superintendent Rosa Blackwell said. "To retain the status of continuous improvement is a good thing, but we also know we have to continue to strive for excellence."Here in Toledo though, the almost similar rating was
stated as:
Toledo Public Schools, the region’s largest school system with about 30,000 students, held on to its continuous improvement status.
Interim Superintendent John Foley promised the district would continue to improve and said the system’s five-year plan is to reach the effective rating.
In Lucas County, Toledo Public Schools was the only district not rated effective or excellent.
However what the Toledo Blade article doesn't point out is there are no larger public school systems rated effective or excellent. All but Cleveland are listed as Continuous Improvement, Cleveland is in Academic Watch. Which leads me to my pet peeve about the whole report card system, you can't even made a valid comparison of your own district from one year to the next because they change the number of indicators every year.
This additional Toledo Blade article gave more information but still no specifics such as...
Some schools within the Toledo Public School system were ranked "Effective", Arlington Elementary, Crossgates Elementary, Elmhurst Elementary, Grove Patterson Academy Elementary, Hawkins Elementary, Larchmont Elementary, Navarre Elementary, Old West End Academy, Ottawa River Elementary, Bowsher High School
(my former high school!) and Start High School.
Beverly
(my former elementary school!) was ranked "Excellent", as well as Harvard Elementary and Toledo Technology Academy High School
Cherry was ranked "Academic Emergency" along with Hale Elementary, King Elementary, Lagrange Elementary, Pickett Elementary and Sherman Elementary. All other local elementaries and high schools were either "Academic Watch" or "Continuous Improvement". So there are some good schools within the Toledo Public School System, and some that still have a ways to go. From all reports next year will be more difficult since the indicators will again change...
:-)
UPDATE: for another parent's view on
this issue stop by and visit Random Thoughts on TPS.