Friday, October 27, 2006

Mark Dansack Media Release on Campaign Finance

From the Mark Dansack for District 46 campaign:

Campaign Finance Reports/Mark Wagoner, fiscal conservative or reckless spender??

Citizens of District 46

"The pre-general campaign finance reports are due today and I think they are worth a comment or two. Do we want or need to have all this money influencing our election campaigns? Should we look toward some sort of campaign finance reform to stop the madness which our elections have become? I think we need to seriously consider changing a system which is tilted so severely toward incumbent office-holders and leaves them in debt to their huge corporate contributors at the expense of ordinary hard working citizens in our state."

Link to Mark Wagoner's reports:
here

Link to Mark Dansack's reports:
here


"It's quite ironic that the self-described fiscal conservative, Mr. Wagoner, lists expenditures of $146,022.15 in his pre-general finance report campaigning for a seat that pays somewhere around $50,000 trying with all his might to dispatch a political newcomer such as myself, considering my report shows expenditures of $6,320.43 over the same period."

"I'm not sure District 46 residents will benefit from such a reckless spending pattern should Mr. Wagoner return to Columbus for an additional two years. I encourage residents of District 46 to investigate this link to Mark Wagoner's contributions here, and take a look at mine as well Mark Dansack contributions here, to determine for yourself whether you want a state representative who is indebted to huge contributors and lobbyists for the next two years or a state representative whose only concern is to be a representative for the people of District 46."

"Take a look and compare. The choice is simple. You can choose a candidate who accepts large donations from numerous special interest groups, and lobbyists representing huge banking, health care, energy, and manufacturing entities; or you can choose a citizen candidate whose only concern will be to help clean up the mess down in Columbus, turn our state government back to the people of Ohio, and get to work on some of the problems that have been ignored over the past decade."

"Citizens of District 46 should ask Mr. Wagoner how he can accept $500 from RJ Reynolds PAC when he "supports" issue 5. Consider his statements that he is a watchdog for energy prices in Northwest Ohio and contrast that with the $3,000 contribution he accepted from the First Energy PAC."

"We deserve to know who our representatives will be working for in the next two years. Let's take it back for all Ohioans. They've had their turn, now it's our turn. Send the power brokers in Columbus a message that our state cannot be bought and paid for."

Mr. Dansack is married to Heather and they live in Monclova Township with their daughters Caitlin and Sophia. Dansack is a legal aide with Gallon, Takacs, Boissoneault & Schaffer in their Workers Compensation Department. He previously spent 18 years working with General Mills, Inc. in Toledo.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

I think if he takes money from RJ Reynolds AND is for Issue 5 it is proof positive Wagoner makes decision independent of who gives him a buck.

Unknown said...

I think it would be awesome if Lucas County had campaign finance information online as the State does. I was going thru the link that Mark provided and this one contributor caught my eye to Mark Wagoner, Boich, who donated $10,000. So I did some checking and in 2006 alone Mr. Boich and his family has been very busy in making donations, even to Bob Ney:

here

Interestingly enough the Boich name is also involved in a group called "American for Coal Jobs Voter Fund" that even Tom Noe contributed to in 2004. link and this was just found in a manner of seconds in searching the name "Boich".

Anonymous said...

It is obvious who is being bought by whom. WOW, So much Political Action Money . Mark Dansack's support is basically citizens for change. Mr. Wagoner said that he was for issue 4 ,I thought. I thought that he stated this on Conklin and co. That is the one which nullifies any already existing bans on smoking is it not? That makes more sense. He also gets a lot of his money from big medical entities- which led to the famous UT-MUO merger which he claims to have been such a big part of. All are Big Business concerns;and it's where he looks to spend our tax dollars. He paints Mr. Dansack's face green in his slick TV ads- but two years ago didn't he FIRST run for office? By the way, a lot of people in the 46th district are getting tired of his tactics. Mr. Wagoner wants to try to fund Education in Ohio By cutting payments to "um, Medicare and or Medicaid". This was also stated on Conklin and Co. For having lessons from a consultant on image and P.R. ,he STILL makes those sounds between his phrases and words. And um, I think he still has not given his Tom Noe money to the BWC , opting to give it to a charity which I um, uh, believe is rich, since it wasn't his money to begin with.......mj

Unknown said...

You are correct mj - this current term is listed as Mark Wagoner's first term in office verfied at this link

Anonymous said...

I'm sorry, apparently Mr. Wagoner does support issue 4. He only led Lee Conklin to believe that he supports issue 5 when he didn't correct Conklin's erroneous assumption.

It's a good thing that Mr. Wagoner wears his "integrity" on his sleeve.

By the way, did he accept Dansack's offer to debate the tax issue yet?